Published on August 16, 2023
Resolving the Choice Between Horizontal and Inclined Shears in Scrap Metal Processing
The longstanding debate between horizontal and inclined shears has been a constant topic in the realm of scrap metal processing. Yet, it's time to confront a significant truth - the inclined shear, often hailed as the champion, is revealing its flaws. While advocates for the inclined shear persist, the undeniable advantages of the horizontal shear system are coming to the forefront. This article delves into the compelling reasons why it's high time to settle the Horizontal vs Inclined Shear dispute.
The Horizontal Shear: A Crane Operator's Trusted Partner
In the complex landscape of scrap metal processing, the safety and efficiency of the crane operator stand as paramount concerns. A pivotal distinction that's frequently overlooked is the role of the crane operator. To mitigate risks of equipment damage and potential accidents, focusing on one task at a time is essential. This is where the horizontal shear system shines, offering true automation. Through this setup, the operator can place the scrap into the feeding box, initiate closure, and then watch the shear work autonomously. This empowers the crane operator to dedicate their attention to the crane operation itself, rather than the continual monitoring demanded by the inclined shear - a taxing and distracting ordeal.
Confronting the Pitfalls of the "Busy Fool Syndrome"
The inclined shear is not immune to a phenomenon known as the "busy fool syndrome." Despite showcasing a higher count of guillotine cycles or cuts per hour compared to the horizontal shear, it often operates well below its full cutting capacity. Imagine investing in a 1000t shear that largely functions as a 500t shear. Does this align with prudent decision-making? On the contrary, the horizontal shear delivers a more justifiable return on investment with every cutting cycle. It methodically injects or propels a full scrap quantity for each cycle, effectively eliminating unproductive cycles and extraneous movements that squander valuable time and energy.
Mastery over Cutting Lengths
Another notable triumph of the horizontal shear lies in its refined control over scrap cutting lengths. The technology employed involves a controlled pusher cylinder, ensuring precision in cutting. In contrast, the inclined shear relies on haphazard gravity feeding, leaving the outcome of scrap movement to chance. This randomness often results in over-length pieces that tumble from the unregulated feeding box. This inefficiency leads to additional processing steps, double handling, and time wastage. Imagine a crane operator grappling to fit scrap within an inclined box - a scenario marked by inefficiency and impracticality.
Baling: The Unmet Need of Inclined Shears
A cornerstone process in scrap metal recycling, baling facilitates streamlined storage and transport. Regrettably, this is an area where the inclined shear falls short. Unlike its horizontal counterpart, the inclined shear fails to accommodate baling operations. This stark contrast underscores the horizontal shear's adaptability and efficacy, seamlessly multitasking without compromising performance.
Embracing the Superiority of the Horizontal Shear
The curtain has fallen on the debate between Horizontal and Inclined Shears. The true epitome of automation stands tall in the form of the horizontal shear machine. With its efficiency, precision, and minimal movement approach, it consistently maximizes its cutting potential, delivering customers tangible value with each cutting cycle. In contrast to the mentally taxed inclined shear operators, the horizontal shear empowers crane operators to wholeheartedly engage in their core tasks without perpetual apprehension. In the quest for progress and efficiency, it's unequivocally evident that the horizontal shear reigns supreme in the realm of scrap metal processing.
Written by
Julien Jean
Manager of MyScrapMachine
